{"id":64531,"date":"2025-01-13T00:59:06","date_gmt":"2025-01-12T23:59:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cecile-zakine.fr\/?page_id=64531"},"modified":"2025-01-13T15:42:34","modified_gmt":"2025-01-13T14:42:34","slug":"asl-et-copropriete-les-5-choses-a-savoir","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.cecile-zakine.fr\/en\/asl-et-copropriete-les-5-choses-a-savoir\/","title":{"rendered":"ASL and Co-ownership \u2013 5 Things to Know"},"content":{"rendered":"
[et_pb_section fb_built= \u00bb1\u2033 _builder_version= \u00bb4.27.4\u2033 _module_preset= \u00bbdefault \u00bb global_colors_info= \u00bb{} \u00bb][et_pb_row _builder_version= \u00bb4.27.4\u2033 _module_preset= \u00bbdefault \u00bb global_colors_info= \u00bb{} \u00bb][et_pb_column type= \u00bb4_4\u2033 _builder_version= \u00bb4.27.4\u2033 _module_preset= \u00bbdefault \u00bb global_colors_info= \u00bb{} \u00bb][et_pb_text _builder_version= \u00bb4.27.4\u2033 _module_preset= \u00bbdefault \u00bb global_colors_info= \u00bb{} \u00bb]<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The coexistence of a Free Trade Union Association (ASL) and a co-ownership within the same real estate complex raises significant legal and practical issues. The analysis of recent case law, particularly through the VIA MARENDA case, highlights the essential points of vigilance in the management of these dual structures.<\/p>\n
The fundamental distinction between the ASL, governed by the 2004 ordinance, and the co-ownership, subject to the law of July 10, 1965<\/a>, imposes a strict separation in their administration. This legal duality is manifested both in governance<\/a> than in asset management. The consistent case law of the Court of Cassation underlines the importance of maintaining the autonomy of these two entities, under penalty of seeing their decisions tainted with nullity.<\/p>\n Financial management is a critical point in the ASL-co-ownership coexistence<\/a>The case law of March 9, 2023 (Cass. 3rd civ., no. 21-21793) clearly establishes that the charges due to the ASL cannot be included in the provisional budget of the condominium association.<\/strong> This requirement for accounting separation extends to all financial flows, including in particular:<\/p>\n The legal nature of the debts constitutes a major distinguishing element between the two structures.s condominium charges<\/a> are a personal obligation of the co-owner<\/strong>, while ASL charges are attached to the real estate itself, in accordance with theArticle 3 of the order of July 1, 2004.<\/a><\/strong> This fundamental distinction has a direct impact on:<\/p>\n2. The Imperative of Accounting Separation<\/h2>\n
\n
3. The Dichotomy of Financial Obligations<\/h2>\n
\n
4. The Principle of Charges-Services Correlation<\/h2>\n