Behind the scenes of the 2024 Olympic Games, a social conflict is brewing. At the heart of the controversy: the controversial use of the daily package system. This system, supposed to offer more flexibility to independent workers, seems to have been diverted from its initial objective, leaving thousands of workers in a precarious and potentially illegal situation.<\/span><\/p>\n The daily package, governed by article L. 3121-58 of the Labor Code<\/a>, is a system for calculating working time in days rather than hours over a year. Initially designed for managers, it can also be applied to "autonomous employees" under certain strict conditions.<\/span><\/p>\n Ms. Sarah Zakine, labor law attorney<\/a>, explains: "To be eligible for the daily package, an employee must benefit from real autonomy in organizing their schedule. This is the sine qua non condition of this system."<\/span><\/p>\n However, according to the testimonies collected, the employees of the 2024 Olympic Games seem far from this promised autonomy.<\/span><\/p>\n "We were made to sign contracts for a flat rate per day, but we are forced to work strict hours, from 1:30 p.m. to 11 p.m.," an airport employee testified anonymously. "Where is our freedom of organization?"<\/span><\/p>\n This situation raises serious legal questions. Article L. 3121-59 of the Labor Code clearly states that the daily package can only apply to employees<\/a> "who have autonomy in organizing their schedule.<\/span><\/p>\n The COJO is exposed to heavy sanctions. "In the event of a dispute, the courts could reclassify these fixed-day contracts as standard contracts," warns Mr. Zakine. "This would imply the retroactive payment of all overtime worked, increased as appropriate."<\/span><\/p>\n The case law is clear on this point. In a judgment of 2 July 2014 (no. 13-11940), the Court of Cassation recalled that the lack of autonomy of the employee nullifies the flat-rate days agreement<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\nThe daily package: a poorly implemented system?<\/b><\/h2>\n
Imposed schedules, fictitious autonomy<\/b><\/h2>\n
Risks for the Olympic Games Organizing Committee (OCOG)<\/b><\/h2>\n
A call to action for employees<\/b><\/h2>\n